Hello everyone,
I just have to ask this question, as it has puzzled me for a while. Some context - been running quite a bit the last 2 years, after a decade+ of reversing all my athleticism from being a basketball player up to like 26, by becoming a sedentary couch potato.
Needless to say, my fitness levels were really bad at the start, in the low 30s, but with some persistence I am now having some 46 VO2max runs if weather's good, and some of my fast kms can go to 50-ish already.
But as VO2max increases, the Easy TRIMP values that I would generally use as a training guide have become more and more unrealistic to the point where I'd have to run like 14kms everyday in a chill tempo pace, and add some strength training, and some walking just to hit 0. At lower VO2max, I'd rest a day, and recover it all with a 17-20 km long run. Now that run would just barely get me to Easy TRIMP 0 and tomorrow I'd have to go again. I am starting to feel these calculations are not realistic, as I imagine proper athletes have 65-70 VO2max (and higher) and Easy TRIMP must be insanely high for them, so even with 2 training sessions/day, they might still come short.
Are people largely not bothering with this figure? Or is it a valuable indicator more for beginners with a low VO2max that will get high TRIMP numbers due to the HR spiking up in the higher zones even in slow runs?